Today, we have
Disney’s The Little Elephant That Could
and by that, of course, I mean Dumbo.
This is another Disney film that I haven’t seen in decades. Of
course, I remembered a lot of base elements from this film;
elephants, circuses, Jim Crow, flying. But, I completely forgot what
it was about or how the story flowed. The experience can be described
like seeing a movie that you’ve heard others talk about for the
first time. Overall, I’d say that this is a nice, emotionally
compelling movie, but I’m not sure that this was necessarily a step
forward for Disney Animation Studios.
![]() |
Original Poster Sourced via IMDB |
Summary:
The story opens with storks bringing babies to a group of circus
animals. Mrs. Jumbo gets brought a son with
very large ears. The other elephants make fun of him and call him
Dumbo. Soon after, his mom gets separated from him because defends
him from a group of children accosting him. Timothy Mouse, a nearby
mouse in a band uniform, takes Dumbo under his wing and together they
work together to discovered the real potential of Dumbo.
I’ll
start off with the music for this film and, my goodness, there’s a
lot of songs in Dumbo.
The
movie starts on a musical piece and there’s a new musical scene
ever few scenes until around the midway point of the movie. The
first thing I noticed about this movie was it’s music, specifically
that it sounds dated. Unlike Snow
White or
Pinocchio,
the music in the movie sounds like it was made in the 1940’s and,
because of this, I find it difficult to separate this movie from the
time it was made.
It slows down a little after that, but the movie remains fairly
musical. I would say that this movie, even more than Snow
White or
Pinocchio,
sets a standard for future “Disney Musicals.”
Disney
is peculiar with the concept of musicals.
Until the “Disney Renaissance,” I don’t feel that Disney had
any “real musicals.” Everything was more like Dumbo,
where there are musical-esque songs, but they aren’t used as much,
or in the same way, that an actual stage musical might use it.
There’s just a different feeling and flow in the music. For
example, I think it’d be hard for anyone to say that The
Aristocats or
The
Jungle Book
are musicals, in the traditional sense, but they have diegetic songs,
sang by the characters that comment on their situation. On the
offhand, things closer to the “Disney Renaissance,” such as The
Lion King
or The
Hunchback of Notre Dame
are much closer in feeling to a traditional stage musical.
I
feel
that the animation for Dumbo
is a downgrade from previous films. Not that it looks bad, per se,
but the animation changed from a more grounded style, such as
Pinocchio
and
Snow
White,
to a much more cartoon-y style. It’s jarring when you’re coming
from Disney’s past work. The movie has some much more expressive
sequences because of this cartoon-y nature and, given the length of
the film, a lot of emotion and information is conveyed in these
animation sequences. Despite this, I find it hard to shake the
feeling that this movie is less serious and cheaper than previous
offerings. That, combined with the extremely short length (64
minutes), makes Dumbo
feel like like an extended short, not a feature length animated film.
The length is biggest flaw with Dumbo. This might be taken very negatively, but the movie seems unfinished. Up until this point, Dumbo is the most emotionally engaging Disney animated film. Dumbo’s separation from his mother, the ostracization he deals with, the poor treatment he gets from those around him are all beautifully set up in the film. But when this emotional build-up finally pays off, everything is so rushed that it’s hard to take in. Basically, it seems that the they ran out of time to make the third act, so they wrap it all up in less than five minutes.
From
a thematic standpoint, Dumbo
seems to be a sappier The
Little Engine That
Could.
This is even referenced with the anthropomorphic train character
saying “I think I can” repeatedly as he’s climbing a hill. It
also draws inspiration from The
Ugly Duckling.
As I stated previously, this is easily the most emotionally engaging
Disney animated film until this point, even if it is quickly
overthrown by Bambi,
which is coming up next. Underneath
this base level comparison to The
Little Engine That Could,
there seems to be a strange racial component to the films message.
Besides the elephants, every speaking character of the film, and a
lot of non-speaking roles, either are or are clearly supposed to be
representative of different races that had been marginalized in the
U.S. during the time this movie was made. The circus owner is clearly
Italian; the laborers that put up the circus tent and the crows are
clearly black; the clowns
and Timothy Mouse are clearly Irish. The
crows, in particular, are pretty egregious, but I think that, like a
lot of examples of “racist” caricatures of this and earlier
times, people are a little extreme in their willingness to disavow
things like this. I could roll out the tired argument that it was a
different time, but I think people misunderstand the actual use these
controversial elements.
Disney
and the animators knew what they were doing, but these characters are
cartoons and the expressiveness they’re given is made with purpose.
Dumbo is rejected by the other elephants, his own people, and is sent
to live amongst the downtrodden and marginalized. I
think it’s important to note, the poor situation these different
groups find themselves in are presented as how things are, not
necessarily how things ought to be. I don’t see it as problematic
to show that people are living in a marginalized state, but it might
be if you are justifying their position in such a state.
It is through his interaction with this world (the “world of
experience”) and the assistance of some of the members of this
marginalized society, he is able to realize
his potential and succeed. Not only does he succeed regaining the
acceptance of his own kind, he overcomes them. Much
like Siddhartha Gautama or Jesus Christ, Dumbo has to live amongst
the common in order to achieve true self realization.
Going
off of this quasi-religious theme, I also feel people don’t really
understand the significance of the infamous Pink Elephants sequence.
I’ve even seen people describe it as a so-called “Big-Lipped Alligator Moment.” What I think people are missing is that
this scene is necessary as it acts as a sort of “Bacchanalian
Revelation.” Through the use a psychoactive substance, he goes
through a metaphorical “spirit journey” and “opens his third
eye.” This, of course, is all metaphorical, but I think that it’s
an important thematic element for the film. I think it’s also a
really cool, fun sequence and it’s probably the best piece of
animation in the whole film.
All
in all, Dumbo is good. I wouldn’t say it’s my favorite and, so
far, I think it’s either my least favorite or my second least
favorite. It's got the feels, but I'm not sure if this is enough to carry it.
-CJ
Dumbo feels out of place with what we’ve seen so far. It clocks in at only 63 minutes, and it feels more like a long cartoon than a feature film. The colors are bright, the animals are almost feel overly cartoony with what we’ve seen in the past, and all together it just makes it feel over simplified. I still really love this movie, it tugs your heartstrings in a way that Snow White, and Pinocchio fail to do, and I’d argue that out of all of the movies we’ve seen so far that it’s got some of the most memorable songs and scenes of anything we’ve reviewed so far. The main question now is it better than its predecessors?
I
would honestly say that the lack of detail in this film is both a
blessing and a curse. First
and foremost Dumbo leaves me feeling torn about
the lack of art in this film compared to what we’ve seen before.
There’s a real lack of back ground art from prior movies, and it
almost feels harmful. It’s not as easy to fall into the carnival,
as it was to fall into the worlds of Pinocchio, Snow White, and
Fantasia, and it just leaves me wanting more from this movie. I’d
even say that this movie looks like something that came out of
“Wartime Disney”. It looks like something we’d get after 1942,
or 1943, something like Fun and Fancy Free, or
Saludos Amigos. I’d even say if I hadn’t known what year
Dumbo actually debuted, I would’ve guessed it hit sometime in the
late 40’s or 50’s.
But is the lack of
detail really that bad?
While I wish we had
more detail in this film, I think it the lack of it actually helps us
connect to the characters, especially since Dumbo is mute. We really
have no where else to focus our attention to, even when there are
people on the screen. When we’re dealing with people they’re
overly simplified, or sometimes just blotted out. With the exception
of the Ringmaster, and the mob of children that mock and attack Dumbo
we’re left with faceless, and detail-less mobs of men.
The lack of
backgrounds, and additional characters makes it so we have to pay
attention to Dumbo and Timothy and their relationship in the world.
Both Timothy and Dumbo are alone in the world, outcasts of society,
and this works incredibly well for the ‘feels factor’. Dumbo’s
ears end up putting his mother behind bars and eventually ostracize
him from his heard. We can assume that Timothy left home to join the
circus, to stop being a burden on his family, or to live the dream of
being famous. They’re both without friends or family, but they both
come together in a tooth rotting sweet way.
Music-wise Dumbo
really stands out. “Pink Elephants on Parade” and “When I See
an Elephant Fly” are two songs that really stand the test of time.
They may not be the most memorable, but they certainly stand out to
anything done in Snow White
or Pinocchio. I
will say I may be a bit bias here, since “Pink Elephants on
Parade” is honestly my favorite stand alone song and section of
this film. It fully embraces the surrealism of the 1930’s and
1940’s and throws the audience into a chaotic whirling mess.
Story wise Dumbo is
well put together. It’s well paced, and we’re not strung along
the plot line, but it does feel incredibly short. The action we do
see, while in numerous shots, its fairly short and energizing, and
helps to move the plot and keep us engaged, and I think that works in
the movies favor. I also appreciate that the sentimental moments
don’t seem to linger on and on, but there is a jarring interruption
in the ‘feels trip’ when Dumbo gets back from seeing his mother.
Instead of riding the heartfelt moment, we just experienced we’re
met with the clowns discussing Dumbo, and how to use him in the next
act. I’d say it ruins the moment, and I’m on the fence about
this. I almost wish we’d get more of Dumbo and Mrs. Jumbo’s
relationship, and how the separation is affecting them. However, we’re
instead treated to a quick dose of how the real world treats Dumbo,
and how poorly treated he is. I wish this scene would’ve been a bit
longer, and better fleshed out.
The only other thing
I have issue with here is the ending. There’s 6 minutes from the
time Dumbo gets the magic feather to the end of the film, and in that
time we see him fly, create panic at the circus, and see headlined
papers about how world famous he is. I don’t hate the ending, but I
do wish there had been some more chaos, or a better wrapped up
ending. It just feels like Disney met the financial limit for this
film, and had to end it.
Dumbo is a good
film, but I don’t think it’s the best out of what we’ve seen so
far. Snow White, Pinocchio, and Fantasia all
look better than Dumbo, and narrative wise, I’d say that
Pinocchio still tops the chart as far as narrative goes, with
Dumbo pulling a close second. Dumbo would be my first
choice musically, since the songs are all pretty catchy. Art wise
though, it just doesn’t feel like it’s all there, and that puts
this at the bottom of the charts so far for me.
-AJ
No comments:
Post a Comment